Quality control and peer review for posture reports
Peer review is not mistrust; it is professional standardisation.
At a glance
- Sample 5–10 reports monthly per therapist rotation.
- Use a one-page rubric: clarity, limits, consent cues, exercise linkage.
- Log coaching notes separately from patient-visible PDFs.
Cadence that survives busy months
Tie QA to payroll weeks or team meetings so it becomes rhythmic. Ad-hoc review dies under caseload pressure.
Rubrics prevent personality conflicts
Objective criteria reduce “I wouldn’t phrase it that way” debates. Focus on missing safety statements and ambiguous numbers.
How many credits does each analysis type use?
Fast, Standard, Advanced, and Dynamic analyses use different credit amounts—there’s a dedicated guide in this hub; Pricing also has plans and FAQs on monthly renewal.
Explore pricingCulture: feedback forward, not backward shaming
Frame review as calibration. Celebrate improvements publicly, discuss errors privately with clear pathways.
PosturalCheck permissions supporting review workflows
Grant seniors view rights on junior drafts before export where policy allows. Use audit logs to confirm reviews occurred.
Related guides
- Aligning posture workflows across clinicians in one clinic
Operational playbook for owners: SOP workshops, protocol naming, and how PosturalCheck roles mirror real-world responsibilities.
Read article - Posture report structure: clarity for referrers, patients, and insurers
Section ordering, headings, and redundancy that improve comprehension—apply these patterns to PosturalCheck PDF templates.
Read article - Audit trails in clinic software: why posture clinics should care
Beyond compliance theatre—how logs support dispute resolution, training, and safe use of PosturalCheck with health imagery.
Read article
From reading to the product: plans and credits at a glance
On Pricing you can compare subscriptions, monthly credits included, operator seats, and features (PDF reports, comparisons, stats, roles).
Go to pricing